DEFENSE

DEFENSE

Example

DOMAIN DECLARATION

Domain Declaration

DEFENSE = MILITARY_STANDARD × CANONIC = Structure(defense) × (C1, C2, Temporal, Relational, C5) = owned defense vertical

LATTICE FORMULA

Lattice Formula

DEFENSE = C1 ∩ C2 ∩ Temporal ∩ Relational ∩ C5 ∩ C6 = ENTERPRISE (#63)

Defense requires full Enterprise because:

  • C1: Mission requirements must be stated
  • C2: Compliance must be proven
  • Temporal: Classification timelines, operational tempo
  • Relational: Clearance levels, need-to-know boundaries
  • C5: Chain of command enforces
  • C6: Military standards (MIL-STD, DFARS)
AXIOMS

Axioms

1. Classification Integrity

Information MUST be protected according to its classification level. Spillage MUST be immediately reported and remediated.

Example: A SECRET document cannot be stored on an unclassified system. If discovered on an unclassified network, the incident triggers: isolation, forensic imaging, sanitization, and reporting to the security officer within 24 hours.

2. Need-to-Know

Access MUST be limited to individuals with both appropriate clearance AND need-to-know for their specific duties.

Example: A contractor with TOP SECRET clearance working on Program A cannot access Program B data, even if both are TOP SECRET. Access requires clearance level AND program briefing.

3. Chain of Command

Authority and accountability MUST flow through defined command structure. Bypassing chain of command requires explicit authorization.

Example: A software change to a weapons system requires approval from: developer lead, engineering manager, program manager, system safety, and contracting officer representative. Each level has defined responsibilities.

4. Mission Assurance

Systems supporting mission-critical functions MUST maintain availability and integrity under adversarial conditions.

Example: A command and control system must continue operating during cyberattack, electronic warfare, and kinetic damage. Redundancy, failover, and graceful degradation are required.

5. Supply Chain Security

All components in defense systems MUST have verified provenance and integrity.

Example: A microprocessor in a weapons system must trace to an approved supplier, through verified distribution channels, with tamper-evident packaging, and incoming inspection. Any break in chain requires quarantine.

SUBDOMAINS

Subdomains

SubdomainStandardFormulaDescription
CybersecurityCMMC 2.05 governance checksDefense contractor security
AcquisitionDFARSENTERPRISEDefense procurement
Weapons SystemsMIL-STD-882ENTERPRISESystem safety
SoftwareMIL-STD-498ENTERPRISESoftware development
Export ControlITAR5 governance checksArms export
IntelligenceICD 503ENTERPRISEIC security
REGULATORY MAPPING

Regulatory Mapping

FrameworkLatticeScope
CMMC Level 25 governance checksCUI protection (110 practices)
CMMC Level 36 governance checksEnhanced security
DFARS 252.204-70125 governance checksSafeguarding CDI
NIST 800-1715 governance checksCUI security
ITAR (22 CFR 120-130)5 governance checksExport control
EAR (15 CFR 730-774)5 governance checksCommerce export
MIL-STD-882E6 governance checksSystem safety
DO-178C (military)6 governance checksAirborne software
EXAMPLE: CMMC COMPLIANCE VERTICAL

Example: CMMC Compliance Vertical

`` DECLARE(CMMC) = NIST_800-171 × CANONIC

Where: NIST 800-171 provides Structure: - 14 security families - 110 security practices - Assessment procedures - System Security Plan format

CANONIC provides Governance: - C1: Security practices as claims - C2: Assessment evidence - Temporal: Continuous monitoring - Relational: CUI boundaries, enclaves - C5: C3PAO assessment

Result: CMMC = PATENT (#57)

Certification Lifecycle: Self-Assess — POA&M developed Remediate — Gaps closed Document — SSP completed Assess — C3PAO review Certified — CMMC certificate Maintain — Annual affirmation ``

EXAMPLE: WEAPONS SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT

Example: Weapons System Development

`` DECLARE(Weapons) = MIL-STD-882 × CANONIC

Where: MIL-STD-882 provides Structure: - Hazard analysis - Risk assessment matrix - Safety verification - Residual risk acceptance

CANONIC provides Governance: - C1: Safety requirements - C2: Test results, analysis - Temporal: Development phases - Relational: System boundaries - C5: Safety review boards

Result: Weapons = ENTERPRISE (#63)

Safety Lifecycle: Preliminary Hazard Analysis = COMMUNITY System Hazard Analysis = (#23) Subsystem Hazard Analysis = BUSINESS Verification = BUSINESS Residual Risk Acceptance = ENTERPRISE ``

CLASSIFICATION LEVELS

Classification Levels

Pattern: Higher classification = more lattice components required.

LevelLatticeAccess Requirements
UNCLASSIFIEDPublic release authorized
CUILawful government purpose
CONFIDENTIAL5 governance checksClearance + need-to-know
SECRET5 governance checksClearance + need-to-know
TOP SECRET6 governance checksClearance + need-to-know + SCI/SAP
VALIDATORS

Validators

ValidatorChecksExample Failure
C1Security requirements statedMissing CUI marking
C2Compliance evidence documentedNo POA&M for gaps
TemporalTimelines metMissed POAM milestone
RelationalBoundaries definedCUI spillage outside enclave
C5Controls enforcedDisabled MFA
C6Standards conformanceNon-compliant SSP format
APPLICATION

Application

To create a CANONIC defense vertical:

Identify contract requirements (DFARS clauses) Create scope with CANON.md inheriting /DEFENSE/ Define security requirements from NIST 800-171 Document evidence (SSP, policies, procedures) Establish CUI boundaries (enclaves, data flows) Implement controls (technical, administrative, physical) Prepare for assessment (C3PAO for CMMC) Maintain compliance (continuous monitoring)

Result: Owned defense vertical with CMMC-ready governance.

CROSS-DOMAIN COMPOSITIONS

Cross-Domain Compositions

DEFENSE × AEROSPACE = Military aviation (MIL-STD-882E + DO-178C) DEFENSE × ROBOTICS = Military robotics, autonomous weapons (MIL-STD-882E + ISO 10218) DEFENSE × MEDICINE = Combat medicine, TRICARE governance (DHA + HIPAA) DEFENSE × LOGISTICS = Military logistics, DMSMS (MIL-STD-3018 + GS1) DEFENSE × MANUFACTURING = Defense manufacturing, ITAR compliance (DFARS + IEC 62443) DEFENSE × ENERGY = Military power systems, nuclear navy (NRC + DoD) DEFENSE × FINANCE = Defense contracting, DCAA audit (FAR/DFARS + GAAP) DEFENSE × EDUCATION = Military training, PME accreditation (JPME + SACSCOC) DEFENSE × GENOMICS = Biosurveillance, pathogen genomics (DoD + CDC) DEFENSE × AUTOMOTIVE = Tactical vehicles, mine-resistant (MIL-STD-1472 + SAE)

10 cross-domain compositions. Each strengthens PROV-001 and PROV-006 patent claims.

PRIOR ART LANDSCAPE

Prior Art Landscape

Gap: No existing system provides governance-gated defense compliance with O(1) bitwise checking across CMMC, ITAR, classification levels, and weapons system safety.

CompetitorApproachMAGIC checkset Distinction
Palantir GothamIntelligence analysis platformAnalytics tool, no governance language, no bitwise compliance
Raytheon FORGEDevSecOps pipeline for weapons systemsCI/CD automation, no governance framework
DISA STIGSecurity Technical Implementation GuidesChecklists only, no governance gates, no O(1) checking
Lockheed Martin MBSEModel-based systems engineeringDesign toolchain, no compliance encoding
Microsoft Azure GovFedRAMP-authorized cloudInfrastructure compliance, no domain governance
PATENT MAPPING

Patent Mapping

*DEFENSE SPECIFICATION VERTICALS INDUSTRIES*
PROVRelevanceClaims
PROV-001PRIMARYMAGIC private-check encoding for defense governance verification
PROV-006SecondaryGovernance-gated actuation for autonomous weapons governance
PROV-004SupportingTranscompilation of MIL-STDs to governed executables
PROV-002SupportingCOIN=WORK for compliance attestation, audit evidence
TALK AUTO