Example
QUALITY = QUALITY_STANDARD × CANONIC
= Structure(quality) × (C1, C2, Temporal, Relational, C5)
= owned quality vertical
QUALITY = C1 ∩ C2 ∩ Temporal ∩ Relational ∩ C5 ∩ C6
= ENTERPRISE (#63)
Quality requires full Enterprise because:
Quality systems MUST be oriented toward meeting customer requirements and enhancing satisfaction.
Example: A software product team collects customer feedback through support tickets, surveys, and usage analytics. Product requirements trace to customer needs. Release decisions consider customer impact.
Work MUST be managed as processes with defined inputs, activities, outputs, and controls.
Example: A manufacturing process defines: raw material specifications (input), machining steps (activities), finished part specifications (output), and inspection checkpoints (controls). Each element is documented and measured.
The organization MUST continually improve the effectiveness of the quality management system.
Example: Monthly quality metrics show defect rate trending upward. Root cause analysis identifies training gap. Corrective action: update training program. Verification: defect rate returns to baseline within two months.
Decisions MUST be based on analysis of data and information.
Example: A decision to change suppliers requires: current supplier performance data, alternative supplier evaluation, cost-benefit analysis, risk assessment, and approval documentation. Opinion alone is insufficient.
Nonconforming products or services MUST be identified, controlled, and prevented from unintended use.
Example: An inspection finds a batch of components out of specification. The batch is: physically segregated, labeled as nonconforming, evaluated for disposition (rework, scrap, use-as-is), and documented. Release requires authorized approval.
Pattern: All quality standards = ENTERPRISE (#63)
| Subdomain | Standard | Formula | Industry |
|---|---|---|---|
| General | ISO 9001 | ENTERPRISE | All industries |
| Medical Devices | ISO 13485 | ENTERPRISE | Healthcare |
| Automotive | IATF 16949 | ENTERPRISE | Automotive |
| Aerospace | AS9100 | ENTERPRISE | Aviation |
| Laboratory | ISO 17025 | ENTERPRISE | Testing/calibration |
| Pharmaceutical | GMP | ENTERPRISE | Drug manufacturing |
| Framework | Lattice | Scope |
|---|---|---|
| ISO 9001:2015 | 6 governance checks | Quality management system |
| ISO 13485:2016 | 6 governance checks | Medical device QMS |
| IATF 16949:2016 | 6 governance checks | Automotive QMS |
| AS9100D | 6 governance checks | Aerospace QMS |
| 21 CFR Part 820 | 6 governance checks | FDA QSR |
| 21 CFR Part 211 | 6 governance checks | FDA GMP |
`` DECLARE(ISO9001) = ISO_9001 × CANONIC
Where: ISO 9001 provides Structure: - Context of organization (Clause 4) - Leadership (Clause 5) - Planning (Clause 6) - Support (Clause 7) - Operation (Clause 8) - Performance evaluation (Clause 9) - Improvement (Clause 10)
CANONIC provides Governance: - C1: Quality policy as CANON - C2: Records in COVERAGE - Temporal: Audit schedules, review cycles - Relational: Scope boundaries, process interactions - C5: Management review, certification body
Result: ISO9001 = ENTERPRISE (#63)
Certification Lifecycle: Gap Assessment = COMMUNITY - Current state vs. standard Documentation — QMS documented Implementation — Processes operating Internal Audit = BUSINESS - Self-assessment Stage 1 Audit = BUSINESS - Documentation review Stage 2 Audit = ENTERPRISE- Implementation audit Certified — Certificate issued Surveillance — Annual audits ``
`` DECLARE(CAPA) = FDA_CAPA × CANONIC
Where: CAPA Framework: - Identification of nonconformance - Root cause analysis - Corrective action - Preventive action - Verification of effectiveness
CANONIC provides Governance: - C1: Problem statement, root cause - C2: Investigation records, test results - Temporal: Due dates, verification timeline - C5: Approval, closure
Result: CAPA = REGULATION (#27)
CAPA Lifecycle: Identify — Nonconformance reported Contain — Immediate action Analyze — Root cause determined Correct — Action implemented Verify — Effectiveness confirmed Close — CAPA completed ``
| Record Type | Lattice | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Quality Policy | D | Management commitment |
| Quality Manual | (#11) | QMS documentation |
| Procedure | (#31) | Process definition |
| Work Instruction | (#11) | Task guidance |
| Inspection Record | (#12) | Conformance evidence |
| Audit Report | BUSINESS | Assessment findings |
| Management Review | BUSINESS | Performance evaluation |
| CAPA Record | (#27) | Improvement documentation |
| Validator | Checks | Example Failure |
|---|---|---|
| C1 | Quality policy exists | Missing quality objectives |
| C2 | Records maintained | No inspection documentation |
| Temporal | Reviews conducted | Overdue management review |
| Relational | Scope defined | Unclear process boundaries |
| C5 | Actions implemented | Open CAPA past due date |
| C6 | Standard conformance | Missing required procedure |
To create a CANONIC quality vertical:
Select quality standard (ISO 9001, 13485, etc.) Create scope with CANON.md inheriting /QUALITY/ Define quality policy and objectives Document processes (procedures, work instructions) Establish records (inspection, audit, review) Define process boundaries (scope, interactions) Implement management system (audits, reviews) Achieve certification (registrar audit)
Result: Owned quality vertical with certified QMS.
QUALITY × MEDICINE = Clinical quality, ISO 13485 (NCQA + ISO 9001)
QUALITY × AEROSPACE = Aviation quality, AS9100 (IAQG + ISO 9001)
QUALITY × AUTOMOTIVE = Automotive quality, IATF 16949 (IATF + ISO 9001)
QUALITY × MANUFACTURING = Manufacturing quality, GMP (ISA-95 + ISO 9001)
QUALITY × DEFENSE = Defense quality, MIL-Q-9858 (DoD + ISO 9001)
QUALITY × GENOMICS = Lab accreditation, CAP proficiency (CAP + ISO 15189)
QUALITY × ENERGY = Nuclear quality, NQA-1 (NRC + ISO 9001)
QUALITY × LOGISTICS = Supply chain quality, ISO 28000 (GS1 + ISO 9001)
QUALITY × FINANCE = Internal controls, SOC reporting (COSO + ISO 9001)
QUALITY × EDUCATION = Academic quality, accreditation (SACSCOC + ISO 21001)
10 cross-domain compositions. Each strengthens PROV-001 and PROV-004 patent claims.
Gap: No existing system provides governance-gated quality management with O(1) bitwise checking across ISO 9001, 13485, AS9100, and cross-domain composition.
| Competitor | Approach | MAGIC checkset Distinction |
|---|---|---|
| ETQ Reliance | Quality management software | Workflow tool, no governance language, no bitwise compliance |
| MasterControl | Document + quality management | Document control, no governance framework |
| Qualio | Cloud QMS for life sciences | SaaS QMS, no O(1) compliance checking |
| Veeva Vault Quality | Pharma-specific quality suite | Industry-specific, no cross-domain governance |
| SAP QM | ERP-integrated quality module | Enterprise module, no governance encoding |
| *QUALITY | SPECIFICATION | VERTICALS | INDUSTRIES* |
| PROV | Relevance | Claims |
|---|---|---|
| PROV-001 | PRIMARY | MAGIC private-check encoding for quality governance verification |
| PROV-004 | PRIMARY | Transcompilation of ISO/GMP/AS standards to governed executables |
| PROV-002 | Supporting | COIN=WORK for audit attestation, CAPA evidence |
| PROV-003 | Supporting | Federated quality compliance across suppliers |