QUALITY

QUALITY

Example

DOMAIN DECLARATION

Domain Declaration

QUALITY = QUALITY_STANDARD × CANONIC = Structure(quality) × (C1, C2, Temporal, Relational, C5) = owned quality vertical

LATTICE FORMULA

Lattice Formula

QUALITY = C1 ∩ C2 ∩ Temporal ∩ Relational ∩ C5 ∩ C6 = ENTERPRISE (#63)

Quality requires full Enterprise because:

  • C1: Quality policy and objectives must be stated
  • C2: Conformance must be demonstrated
  • Temporal: Audit cycles, corrective action timelines
  • Relational: Process boundaries, scope definition
  • C5: Management review, auditors enforce
  • C6: ISO/industry QMS standards
AXIOMS

Axioms

1. Customer Focus

Quality systems MUST be oriented toward meeting customer requirements and enhancing satisfaction.

Example: A software product team collects customer feedback through support tickets, surveys, and usage analytics. Product requirements trace to customer needs. Release decisions consider customer impact.

2. Process Approach

Work MUST be managed as processes with defined inputs, activities, outputs, and controls.

Example: A manufacturing process defines: raw material specifications (input), machining steps (activities), finished part specifications (output), and inspection checkpoints (controls). Each element is documented and measured.

3. Continual Improvement

The organization MUST continually improve the effectiveness of the quality management system.

Example: Monthly quality metrics show defect rate trending upward. Root cause analysis identifies training gap. Corrective action: update training program. Verification: defect rate returns to baseline within two months.

4. Evidence-Based Decision Making

Decisions MUST be based on analysis of data and information.

Example: A decision to change suppliers requires: current supplier performance data, alternative supplier evaluation, cost-benefit analysis, risk assessment, and approval documentation. Opinion alone is insufficient.

5. Nonconformance Control

Nonconforming products or services MUST be identified, controlled, and prevented from unintended use.

Example: An inspection finds a batch of components out of specification. The batch is: physically segregated, labeled as nonconforming, evaluated for disposition (rework, scrap, use-as-is), and documented. Release requires authorized approval.

SUBDOMAINS

Subdomains

Pattern: All quality standards = ENTERPRISE (#63)

SubdomainStandardFormulaIndustry
GeneralISO 9001ENTERPRISEAll industries
Medical DevicesISO 13485ENTERPRISEHealthcare
AutomotiveIATF 16949ENTERPRISEAutomotive
AerospaceAS9100ENTERPRISEAviation
LaboratoryISO 17025ENTERPRISETesting/calibration
PharmaceuticalGMPENTERPRISEDrug manufacturing
REGULATORY MAPPING

Regulatory Mapping

FrameworkLatticeScope
ISO 9001:20156 governance checksQuality management system
ISO 13485:20166 governance checksMedical device QMS
IATF 16949:20166 governance checksAutomotive QMS
AS9100D6 governance checksAerospace QMS
21 CFR Part 8206 governance checksFDA QSR
21 CFR Part 2116 governance checksFDA GMP
EXAMPLE: ISO 9001 VERTICAL

Example: ISO 9001 Vertical

`` DECLARE(ISO9001) = ISO_9001 × CANONIC

Where: ISO 9001 provides Structure: - Context of organization (Clause 4) - Leadership (Clause 5) - Planning (Clause 6) - Support (Clause 7) - Operation (Clause 8) - Performance evaluation (Clause 9) - Improvement (Clause 10)

CANONIC provides Governance: - C1: Quality policy as CANON - C2: Records in COVERAGE - Temporal: Audit schedules, review cycles - Relational: Scope boundaries, process interactions - C5: Management review, certification body

Result: ISO9001 = ENTERPRISE (#63)

Certification Lifecycle: Gap Assessment = COMMUNITY - Current state vs. standard Documentation — QMS documented Implementation — Processes operating Internal Audit = BUSINESS - Self-assessment Stage 1 Audit = BUSINESS - Documentation review Stage 2 Audit = ENTERPRISE- Implementation audit Certified — Certificate issued Surveillance — Annual audits ``

EXAMPLE: CORRECTIVE ACTION PROCESS

Example: Corrective Action Process

`` DECLARE(CAPA) = FDA_CAPA × CANONIC

Where: CAPA Framework: - Identification of nonconformance - Root cause analysis - Corrective action - Preventive action - Verification of effectiveness

CANONIC provides Governance: - C1: Problem statement, root cause - C2: Investigation records, test results - Temporal: Due dates, verification timeline - C5: Approval, closure

Result: CAPA = REGULATION (#27)

CAPA Lifecycle: Identify — Nonconformance reported Contain — Immediate action Analyze — Root cause determined Correct — Action implemented Verify — Effectiveness confirmed Close — CAPA completed ``

QUALITY RECORDS

Quality Records

Record TypeLatticePurpose
Quality PolicyDManagement commitment
Quality Manual(#11)QMS documentation
Procedure(#31)Process definition
Work Instruction(#11)Task guidance
Inspection Record(#12)Conformance evidence
Audit ReportBUSINESSAssessment findings
Management ReviewBUSINESSPerformance evaluation
CAPA Record(#27)Improvement documentation
VALIDATORS

Validators

ValidatorChecksExample Failure
C1Quality policy existsMissing quality objectives
C2Records maintainedNo inspection documentation
TemporalReviews conductedOverdue management review
RelationalScope definedUnclear process boundaries
C5Actions implementedOpen CAPA past due date
C6Standard conformanceMissing required procedure
APPLICATION

Application

To create a CANONIC quality vertical:

Select quality standard (ISO 9001, 13485, etc.) Create scope with CANON.md inheriting /QUALITY/ Define quality policy and objectives Document processes (procedures, work instructions) Establish records (inspection, audit, review) Define process boundaries (scope, interactions) Implement management system (audits, reviews) Achieve certification (registrar audit)

Result: Owned quality vertical with certified QMS.

CROSS-DOMAIN COMPOSITIONS

Cross-Domain Compositions

QUALITY × MEDICINE = Clinical quality, ISO 13485 (NCQA + ISO 9001) QUALITY × AEROSPACE = Aviation quality, AS9100 (IAQG + ISO 9001) QUALITY × AUTOMOTIVE = Automotive quality, IATF 16949 (IATF + ISO 9001) QUALITY × MANUFACTURING = Manufacturing quality, GMP (ISA-95 + ISO 9001) QUALITY × DEFENSE = Defense quality, MIL-Q-9858 (DoD + ISO 9001) QUALITY × GENOMICS = Lab accreditation, CAP proficiency (CAP + ISO 15189) QUALITY × ENERGY = Nuclear quality, NQA-1 (NRC + ISO 9001) QUALITY × LOGISTICS = Supply chain quality, ISO 28000 (GS1 + ISO 9001) QUALITY × FINANCE = Internal controls, SOC reporting (COSO + ISO 9001) QUALITY × EDUCATION = Academic quality, accreditation (SACSCOC + ISO 21001)

10 cross-domain compositions. Each strengthens PROV-001 and PROV-004 patent claims.

PRIOR ART LANDSCAPE

Prior Art Landscape

Gap: No existing system provides governance-gated quality management with O(1) bitwise checking across ISO 9001, 13485, AS9100, and cross-domain composition.

CompetitorApproachMAGIC checkset Distinction
ETQ RelianceQuality management softwareWorkflow tool, no governance language, no bitwise compliance
MasterControlDocument + quality managementDocument control, no governance framework
QualioCloud QMS for life sciencesSaaS QMS, no O(1) compliance checking
Veeva Vault QualityPharma-specific quality suiteIndustry-specific, no cross-domain governance
SAP QMERP-integrated quality moduleEnterprise module, no governance encoding
PATENT MAPPING

Patent Mapping

*QUALITY SPECIFICATION VERTICALS INDUSTRIES*
PROVRelevanceClaims
PROV-001PRIMARYMAGIC private-check encoding for quality governance verification
PROV-004PRIMARYTranscompilation of ISO/GMP/AS standards to governed executables
PROV-002SupportingCOIN=WORK for audit attestation, CAPA evidence
PROV-003SupportingFederated quality compliance across suppliers
TALK AUTO