RELIGION

RELIGION

RELIGION

RELIGION

buddhism
Learn more →
christianity
Learn more →
hinduism
Learn more →
islam
Learn more →
judaism
Learn more →
sikhism
Learn more →
DOMAIN DECLARATION

Domain Declaration

RELIGION = SACRED_TRADITION × CANONIC = Structure(theological) × (C1, C2, Temporal, Relational, C5, C6) = governed sacred vertical

LATTICE FORMULA

Lattice Formula

RELIGION = C1 ∩ C2 ∩ Temporal ∩ Relational ∩ C5 ∩ C6 = ENTERPRISE (#63)

Every major world religion is full ENTERPRISE because millennia of development produce complete governance across all six dimensions. The differences between traditions are not WHETHER they have these dimensions but WHAT they declare, evidence, and structure.

  • C1: Every religion states what is sacred (creed, shahada, shema, dharma, rta)
  • C2: Every religion preserves proof (scripture, oral tradition, lineage)
  • Temporal: Every religion orders time (sacred history, eschatology, cycles, ages)
  • Relational: Every religion draws boundaries (community, heresy, conversion, excommunication)
  • C5: Every religion enforces practice (law, ritual, ethics, discipline)
  • C6: Every religion builds institutions (temple, mosque, sangha, church, synagogue)
UNIVERSAL AXIOMS

Universal Axioms

1. Sacred Distinction

Every religion begins with a fundamental distinction: sacred profane, holy common, dharma adharma.
Example: The IS IS-NOT of CANONIC maps directly. “In the beginning God created” (Genesis 1:1) = declaration of sacred origin. “There is no god but God” (Shahada) = declaration of sacred unity. “All conditioned things are impermanent” (Dhammapada) = declaration of sacred truth.

2. Textual Authority

Every religion preserves authoritative texts that serve as evidential basis for claims.

Example: Torah/Tanakh (Judaism), Bible (Christianity), Quran/Hadith (Islam), Pali CANON/Sutras (Buddhism), Vedas/Upanishads (Hinduism), Guru Granth Sahib (Sikhism). The text IS the evidence — disputes are always “what does the text say?”

3. Temporal Ordering

Every religion structures time — origin, sacred history, present practice, eschatological hope.

Example: Linear time (Abrahamic): Creation → Fall → Covenant → Redemption → Eschaton. Cyclical time (Dharmic): Yugas → Dissolution → Recreation → Yugas. Both are temporal governance.

4. Community Boundary

Every religion defines who is in and who is out — conversion, excommunication, apostasy.

Example: Baptism (Christianity), Shahada (Islam), Bar/Bat Mitzvah (Judaism), Taking Refuge (Buddhism), Sacred Thread (Hinduism), Amrit Sanchar (Sikhism). The boundary ritual IS relational governance.

5. Ethical Operation

Every religion enforces behavior through law, commandment, precept, or dharma.

Example: Ten Commandments (Judaism/Christianity), Five Pillars (Islam), Noble Eightfold Path (Buddhism), Dharma/Karma (Hinduism), Rehat Maryada (Sikhism). Ethics IS operational governance.

6. Institutional Form

Every religion develops organizational structures that persist across generations.

Example: Papacy (Catholicism), Caliphate/Ulama (Islam), Rabbinate (Judaism), Sangha (Buddhism), Shankaracharya seats (Hinduism), Akal Takht (Sikhism). Institution IS structural governance.

TAXONOMY

Taxonomy

Abrahamic Traditions

Share: Monotheism, prophetic revelation, linear time, covenant theology, scripture + tradition.

Dharmic Traditions

Share: Karma, dharma, cyclical time, liberation from suffering, guru lineage.

Tradition Origin Scripture Formula Distinguishing Claims
Hinduism ~1500 BCE Vedas, Upanishads, Gita ENTERPRISE Brahman/Atman, dharma, moksha, avatar
Buddhism ~500 BCE Pali CANON, Sutras ENTERPRISE Four Noble Truths, anatta, nirvana, Middle Way
Sikhism 1469 CE Guru Granth Sahib ENTERPRISE Ik Onkar, guru lineage, seva, equality
Jainism ~600 BCE Agamas ENTERPRISE Ahimsa, anekantavada, asceticism, jiva

East Asian Traditions

Tradition Origin Scripture Formula Distinguishing Claims
Taoism ~400 BCE Tao Te Ching, Zhuangzi (#31) Wu wei, Tao, yin-yang, spontaneity
Confucianism ~500 BCE Analects, Five Classics ENTERPRISE Ren, li, filial piety, mandate of heaven
Shinto Ancient Kojiki, Nihon Shoki BUSINESS Kami, purity, shrine practice, national identity

Other

Tradition Origin Scripture Formula Distinguishing Claims
Zoroastrianism ~1000 BCE Avesta ENTERPRISE Ahura Mazda, cosmic dualism, fire worship
Baha’i 1844 CE Kitab-i-Aqdas ENTERPRISE Progressive revelation, unity, Baha’u’llah
TraditionOriginScriptureFormulaDistinguishing Claims
Judaism~1800 BCETorah, Tanakh, TalmudENTERPRISECovenant election, Torah observance, messianic hope
Christianity~30 CEOld + New TestamentENTERPRISEIncarnation, Trinity, atonement, resurrection
Islam610 CEQuran, Hadith, SunnahENTERPRISETawhid, final prophet, Quran as direct revelation
CROSS-TRADITION LATTICE ANALYSIS

Cross-Tradition Lattice Analysis

The MAGIC framework reveals structural parallels:

DimensionJudaismChristianityIslamBuddhismHinduismSikhism
D (Declare)ShemaNicene CreedShahadaFour TruthsMahavakyasMool Mantar
E (Evidence)Torah/TalmudBible/TraditionQuran/HadithTipitaka/SutrasVedas/ShrutiGuru Granth
T (Time)Creation→MessiahCreation→ParousiaCreation→JudgmentSamsara→NirvanaYugas→PralayaBirth→Mukti
R (Relate)Covenant peopleEcclesiaUmmahSanghaVarna/SampradayaKhalsa
O (Operate)HalakhaCANON lawShariaVinayaDharma/KarmaRehat Maryada
S (Structure)Synagogue/RabbiChurch/BishopMosque/UlamaMonastery/AbbotTemple/GuruGurdwara/Jathedar
SCHISM AS FORMULA DISAGREEMENT

Schism as Formula Disagreement

Every religious schism is a lattice formula disagreement:

Schism = formula disagreement. Orthodoxy = shared minimum. Heresy = D rejected by R.

SchismTraditionsDisputeFormula Shift
Judaism → Christianity1st c. CEChristologyShared , new R boundary
Great Schism1054 CEFilioque + Papal authority ()Same , different
Reformation1517 CEAuthority ()Protestant drops to
Sunni-Shia632 CESuccession ()Same , different
Theravada-Mahayana~100 BCEScope of liberation ()Different D claims, wider R
Shaiva-VaishnavaAncientUltimate deitySame , different D
VALIDATORS

Validators

ValidatorChecksExample Failure
C1Creedal/confessional statements presentDoctrine without declaration
C2Scriptural/traditional basis citedClaim without textual support
TemporalHistorical grounding establishedAhistorical assertion
RelationalCommunity boundary definedCommunion without criteria
C5Ethical/legal mechanism existsFaith without practice
C6Institutional form presentMovement without organization
EXAMPLES

Examples

`` DECLARE(CanonLawGovernance) = CIC_1983 × CANONIC

Where: Code of CANON Law (1983) provides Structure: - Book I: General Norms (canons 1-203) - Book II: People of God (hierarchy, laity, religious life) - Book III: Teaching Function (catechesis, schools, media) - Book IV: Sanctifying Function (sacraments, sacred places) - Book VII: Processes (judicial, penal, administrative)

CANONIC provides Governance: - C1: Doctrinal declarations (creed, magisterium) - C2: Scriptural/traditional evidence (Scripture, Tradition, Councils) - Temporal: Liturgical calendar, canonical deadlines, papal succession - Relational: Diocese/parish boundaries, communion status - C5: Canonical processes (tribunal, dispensation, excommunication) - C6: Institutional form (papacy, curia, religious orders)

Result: CanonLawGovernance = ENTERPRISE (#63)

Governance Lifecycle: Declare — Creedal statement, baptismal promises Evidence — Scriptural/conciliar basis established Temporize — Liturgical year, feast day observance Bound — Diocesan boundaries, canonical status Enforce — Canonical trial, dispensation granted Govern — Full institutional governance `

` DECLARE(IslamicJurisprudence) = USUL_AL_FIQH × CANONIC

Where: Usul al-Fiqh provides Structure: - Quran (primary source) - Sunnah/Hadith (prophetic tradition) - Ijma (scholarly consensus) - Qiyas (analogical reasoning) - Five rulings: wajib, mustahabb, mubah, makruh, haram

CANONIC provides Governance: - C1: Aqidah (creedal declarations — Shahada, Pillars) - C2: Hadith authentication (isnad chain, matn analysis) - Temporal: Hijri calendar, prayer times, Ramadan, Hajj season - Relational: Ummah boundaries, madhab jurisdictions - C5: Sharia enforcement (halal/haram rulings, hudud) - C6: Institutional form (ulama, mufti, qadi, waqf)

Result: IslamicJurisprudence = ENTERPRISE (#63)

Jurisprudence Lifecycle: Source — Quranic ayah and hadith identified Verify — Isnad chain authenticated, context dated Reason — Qiyas applied, madhab position established Rule — Fatwa issued with evidence Govern — Institutional enforcement (court, waqf) ``

APPLICATION

Application

To create a CANONIC religious domain:

Identify declarations — what does this tradition claim as sacred? Map evidence — what texts/traditions support those claims? Trace history — when did these claims arise and how did they evolve? Define community — who is in, who is out, how does one enter/leave? Document practice — what behavior is required, forbidden, encouraged? Describe institutions — what structures persist across generations?

Result: Any religion, mapped to the same governance lattice, comparable across traditions.

CROSS-DOMAIN COMPOSITIONS

Cross-Domain Compositions

RELIGION × EDUCATION = Theological education, seminary accreditation (ATS + SACSCOC) RELIGION × LAW = Religious liberty, institutional exemptions (RFRA + Title VII) RELIGION × FINANCE = Nonprofit governance, church accounting (GAAP + IRS 501(c)(3)) RELIGION × REAL_ESTATE = Sacred property, historic preservation (NHPA + zoning) RELIGION × MEDICINE = Bioethics, chaplaincy, faith-based healing (APC + Joint Commission) RELIGION × DEFENSE = Military chaplaincy, religious accommodation (DoD + RFRA) RELIGION × QUALITY = Institutional accreditation, safeguarding (ATS + ISO 37001) RELIGION × GENOMICS = Bioethical governance of genetic technology (religious ethics + ACMG) RELIGION × AGRICULTURE = Kosher/Halal certification, faith-based farming (OU + IFANCA) RELIGION × LOGISTICS = Sacred artifact transport, pilgrimage logistics (UNESCO + IATA)

10 cross-domain compositions. Each strengthens PROV-001 patent claims.

PRIOR ART LANDSCAPE

Prior Art Landscape

Gap: No existing system provides governance-gated religious institutional operations with O(1) bitwise compliance checking across textual authority, institutional form, community governance, and cross-domain composition.

CompetitorApproachMAGIC checkset Distinction
Church Management Software (Planning Center)Attendance, giving, schedulingOperational tool, no governance language, no compliance encoding
Logos Bible SoftwareScripture research + exegesisResearch platform, no governance framework
Faith-based accreditors (ATS)Theological education standardsDomain-specific accreditation, no bitwise compliance
Religious law databases (Sefaria, Shamela)Text aggregation + searchText repositories, no governance gates, no O(1) checking
Interfaith dialogue platformsComparative religion discussionCommunication tools, no structural governance
PATENT MAPPING

Patent Mapping

*RELIGION SPECIFICATION VERTICALS INDUSTRIES*
PROVRelevanceClaims
PROV-001PRIMARYMAGIC private-check encoding for institutional governance verification
PROV-004SecondaryTranscompilation of religious law/canon to governed executables
PROV-003SupportingFederated governance across denominations and traditions
PROV-002SupportingCOIN=WORK for ministerial attestation, sacramental evidence
TALK AUTO