RELIGION = SACRED_TRADITION × CANONIC
= Structure(theological) × (C1, C2, Temporal, Relational, C5, C6)
= governed sacred vertical
RELIGION = C1 ∩ C2 ∩ Temporal ∩ Relational ∩ C5 ∩ C6
= ENTERPRISE (#63)
Every major world religion is full ENTERPRISE because millennia of development produce complete governance across all six dimensions. The differences between traditions are not WHETHER they have these dimensions but WHAT they declare, evidence, and structure.
| Every religion begins with a fundamental distinction: sacred | profane, holy | common, dharma | adharma. |
| Example: The IS | IS-NOT of CANONIC maps directly. “In the beginning God created” (Genesis 1:1) = declaration of sacred origin. “There is no god but God” (Shahada) = declaration of sacred unity. “All conditioned things are impermanent” (Dhammapada) = declaration of sacred truth. |
Every religion preserves authoritative texts that serve as evidential basis for claims.
Example: Torah/Tanakh (Judaism), Bible (Christianity), Quran/Hadith (Islam), Pali CANON/Sutras (Buddhism), Vedas/Upanishads (Hinduism), Guru Granth Sahib (Sikhism). The text IS the evidence — disputes are always “what does the text say?”
Every religion structures time — origin, sacred history, present practice, eschatological hope.
Example: Linear time (Abrahamic): Creation → Fall → Covenant → Redemption → Eschaton. Cyclical time (Dharmic): Yugas → Dissolution → Recreation → Yugas. Both are temporal governance.
Every religion defines who is in and who is out — conversion, excommunication, apostasy.
Example: Baptism (Christianity), Shahada (Islam), Bar/Bat Mitzvah (Judaism), Taking Refuge (Buddhism), Sacred Thread (Hinduism), Amrit Sanchar (Sikhism). The boundary ritual IS relational governance.
Every religion enforces behavior through law, commandment, precept, or dharma.
Example: Ten Commandments (Judaism/Christianity), Five Pillars (Islam), Noble Eightfold Path (Buddhism), Dharma/Karma (Hinduism), Rehat Maryada (Sikhism). Ethics IS operational governance.
Every religion develops organizational structures that persist across generations.
Example: Papacy (Catholicism), Caliphate/Ulama (Islam), Rabbinate (Judaism), Sangha (Buddhism), Shankaracharya seats (Hinduism), Akal Takht (Sikhism). Institution IS structural governance.
Share: Monotheism, prophetic revelation, linear time, covenant theology, scripture + tradition.
Share: Karma, dharma, cyclical time, liberation from suffering, guru lineage.
| Tradition | Origin | Scripture | Formula | Distinguishing Claims |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hinduism | ~1500 BCE | Vedas, Upanishads, Gita | ENTERPRISE | Brahman/Atman, dharma, moksha, avatar |
| Buddhism | ~500 BCE | Pali CANON, Sutras | ENTERPRISE | Four Noble Truths, anatta, nirvana, Middle Way |
| Sikhism | 1469 CE | Guru Granth Sahib | ENTERPRISE | Ik Onkar, guru lineage, seva, equality |
| Jainism | ~600 BCE | Agamas | ENTERPRISE | Ahimsa, anekantavada, asceticism, jiva |
| Tradition | Origin | Scripture | Formula | Distinguishing Claims |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taoism | ~400 BCE | Tao Te Ching, Zhuangzi | (#31) | Wu wei, Tao, yin-yang, spontaneity |
| Confucianism | ~500 BCE | Analects, Five Classics | ENTERPRISE | Ren, li, filial piety, mandate of heaven |
| Shinto | Ancient | Kojiki, Nihon Shoki | BUSINESS | Kami, purity, shrine practice, national identity |
| Tradition | Origin | Scripture | Formula | Distinguishing Claims |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zoroastrianism | ~1000 BCE | Avesta | ENTERPRISE | Ahura Mazda, cosmic dualism, fire worship |
| Baha’i | 1844 CE | Kitab-i-Aqdas | ENTERPRISE | Progressive revelation, unity, Baha’u’llah |
| Tradition | Origin | Scripture | Formula | Distinguishing Claims |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Judaism | ~1800 BCE | Torah, Tanakh, Talmud | ENTERPRISE | Covenant election, Torah observance, messianic hope |
| Christianity | ~30 CE | Old + New Testament | ENTERPRISE | Incarnation, Trinity, atonement, resurrection |
| Islam | 610 CE | Quran, Hadith, Sunnah | ENTERPRISE | Tawhid, final prophet, Quran as direct revelation |
The MAGIC framework reveals structural parallels:
| Dimension | Judaism | Christianity | Islam | Buddhism | Hinduism | Sikhism |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D (Declare) | Shema | Nicene Creed | Shahada | Four Truths | Mahavakyas | Mool Mantar |
| E (Evidence) | Torah/Talmud | Bible/Tradition | Quran/Hadith | Tipitaka/Sutras | Vedas/Shruti | Guru Granth |
| T (Time) | Creation→Messiah | Creation→Parousia | Creation→Judgment | Samsara→Nirvana | Yugas→Pralaya | Birth→Mukti |
| R (Relate) | Covenant people | Ecclesia | Ummah | Sangha | Varna/Sampradaya | Khalsa |
| O (Operate) | Halakha | CANON law | Sharia | Vinaya | Dharma/Karma | Rehat Maryada |
| S (Structure) | Synagogue/Rabbi | Church/Bishop | Mosque/Ulama | Monastery/Abbot | Temple/Guru | Gurdwara/Jathedar |
Every religious schism is a lattice formula disagreement:
Schism = formula disagreement. Orthodoxy = shared minimum. Heresy = D rejected by R.
| Schism | Traditions | Dispute | Formula Shift |
|---|---|---|---|
| Judaism → Christianity | 1st c. CE | Christology | Shared , new R boundary |
| Great Schism | 1054 CE | Filioque + Papal authority () | Same , different |
| Reformation | 1517 CE | Authority () | Protestant drops to |
| Sunni-Shia | 632 CE | Succession () | Same , different |
| Theravada-Mahayana | ~100 BCE | Scope of liberation () | Different D claims, wider R |
| Shaiva-Vaishnava | Ancient | Ultimate deity | Same , different D |
| Validator | Checks | Example Failure |
|---|---|---|
| C1 | Creedal/confessional statements present | Doctrine without declaration |
| C2 | Scriptural/traditional basis cited | Claim without textual support |
| Temporal | Historical grounding established | Ahistorical assertion |
| Relational | Community boundary defined | Communion without criteria |
| C5 | Ethical/legal mechanism exists | Faith without practice |
| C6 | Institutional form present | Movement without organization |
`` DECLARE(CanonLawGovernance) = CIC_1983 × CANONIC
Where: Code of CANON Law (1983) provides Structure: - Book I: General Norms (canons 1-203) - Book II: People of God (hierarchy, laity, religious life) - Book III: Teaching Function (catechesis, schools, media) - Book IV: Sanctifying Function (sacraments, sacred places) - Book VII: Processes (judicial, penal, administrative)
CANONIC provides Governance: - C1: Doctrinal declarations (creed, magisterium) - C2: Scriptural/traditional evidence (Scripture, Tradition, Councils) - Temporal: Liturgical calendar, canonical deadlines, papal succession - Relational: Diocese/parish boundaries, communion status - C5: Canonical processes (tribunal, dispensation, excommunication) - C6: Institutional form (papacy, curia, religious orders)
Result: CanonLawGovernance = ENTERPRISE (#63)
Governance Lifecycle: Declare — Creedal statement, baptismal promises Evidence — Scriptural/conciliar basis established Temporize — Liturgical year, feast day observance Bound — Diocesan boundaries, canonical status Enforce — Canonical trial, dispensation granted Govern — Full institutional governance `
` DECLARE(IslamicJurisprudence) = USUL_AL_FIQH × CANONIC
Where: Usul al-Fiqh provides Structure: - Quran (primary source) - Sunnah/Hadith (prophetic tradition) - Ijma (scholarly consensus) - Qiyas (analogical reasoning) - Five rulings: wajib, mustahabb, mubah, makruh, haram
CANONIC provides Governance: - C1: Aqidah (creedal declarations — Shahada, Pillars) - C2: Hadith authentication (isnad chain, matn analysis) - Temporal: Hijri calendar, prayer times, Ramadan, Hajj season - Relational: Ummah boundaries, madhab jurisdictions - C5: Sharia enforcement (halal/haram rulings, hudud) - C6: Institutional form (ulama, mufti, qadi, waqf)
Result: IslamicJurisprudence = ENTERPRISE (#63)
Jurisprudence Lifecycle: Source — Quranic ayah and hadith identified Verify — Isnad chain authenticated, context dated Reason — Qiyas applied, madhab position established Rule — Fatwa issued with evidence Govern — Institutional enforcement (court, waqf) ``
To create a CANONIC religious domain:
Identify declarations — what does this tradition claim as sacred? Map evidence — what texts/traditions support those claims? Trace history — when did these claims arise and how did they evolve? Define community — who is in, who is out, how does one enter/leave? Document practice — what behavior is required, forbidden, encouraged? Describe institutions — what structures persist across generations?
Result: Any religion, mapped to the same governance lattice, comparable across traditions.
RELIGION × EDUCATION = Theological education, seminary accreditation (ATS + SACSCOC)
RELIGION × LAW = Religious liberty, institutional exemptions (RFRA + Title VII)
RELIGION × FINANCE = Nonprofit governance, church accounting (GAAP + IRS 501(c)(3))
RELIGION × REAL_ESTATE = Sacred property, historic preservation (NHPA + zoning)
RELIGION × MEDICINE = Bioethics, chaplaincy, faith-based healing (APC + Joint Commission)
RELIGION × DEFENSE = Military chaplaincy, religious accommodation (DoD + RFRA)
RELIGION × QUALITY = Institutional accreditation, safeguarding (ATS + ISO 37001)
RELIGION × GENOMICS = Bioethical governance of genetic technology (religious ethics + ACMG)
RELIGION × AGRICULTURE = Kosher/Halal certification, faith-based farming (OU + IFANCA)
RELIGION × LOGISTICS = Sacred artifact transport, pilgrimage logistics (UNESCO + IATA)
10 cross-domain compositions. Each strengthens PROV-001 patent claims.
Gap: No existing system provides governance-gated religious institutional operations with O(1) bitwise compliance checking across textual authority, institutional form, community governance, and cross-domain composition.
| Competitor | Approach | MAGIC checkset Distinction |
|---|---|---|
| Church Management Software (Planning Center) | Attendance, giving, scheduling | Operational tool, no governance language, no compliance encoding |
| Logos Bible Software | Scripture research + exegesis | Research platform, no governance framework |
| Faith-based accreditors (ATS) | Theological education standards | Domain-specific accreditation, no bitwise compliance |
| Religious law databases (Sefaria, Shamela) | Text aggregation + search | Text repositories, no governance gates, no O(1) checking |
| Interfaith dialogue platforms | Comparative religion discussion | Communication tools, no structural governance |
| *RELIGION | SPECIFICATION | VERTICALS | INDUSTRIES* |
| PROV | Relevance | Claims |
|---|---|---|
| PROV-001 | PRIMARY | MAGIC private-check encoding for institutional governance verification |
| PROV-004 | Secondary | Transcompilation of religious law/canon to governed executables |
| PROV-003 | Supporting | Federated governance across denominations and traditions |
| PROV-002 | Supporting | COIN=WORK for ministerial attestation, sacramental evidence |